Showing posts with label New World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New World. Show all posts

April 17 - Horses Arrive in the New World!

  Posted on April 17, 2022

This is an update of my post published on April 17, 2011:





Back in the not-so-good old days, communication was slow and mostly local (NOT global), so people often didn't know what was happening elsewhere. British colonists recorded that, on this date in 1629, they first imported horses to North America—but I have to wonder if these Puritans knew that the Spaniards had been bringing horses to the continent for a century. Native Americans had acquired some of these horses through trades and raids, and by taming wild horses that were the descendants of horses that had escaped from captivity. As a matter of fact, when the Puritans were first shipping horses across the Atlantic, wanting farm animals to work the fields during the week, run in races on Saturdays, and pull their carriages to church on Sunday, the continent was already pounding with hooves, particularly across the mid-Western plains.



Interestingly, horses were in the New World from their (by which I mean the horses') very beginnings! Horses first evolved in North America over 55 million years ago. They wandered over to the "Old World" (Asia and eventually Europe and Northern Africa) over the Alaskan-Siberian land bridge, and in the "Old World," different offshoots such as asses and zebras evolved.


From eight to ten thousand years ago, horses died out in North America. Scientists aren't sure why, although climate change and human hunters are likely two of the main causes for their continent-wide extinction. By the time Hernando Cortes arrived in Mexico in 1519, with 13 horses, horses were unknown to the Aztec and other groups of Native Americans.


Learn more horse history here. You will see from this video that charts that show the evolution of modern horses as a smooth and simple line of slowly-getting-bigger creatures are way oversimplified and contribute to the misunderstanding of evolution!


The evolutionary history of the horse is actually more bush-like, but almost all of the creatures on the bush have gone extinct!


March 9 - Happy Birthday, Amerigo Vespucci


     Posted on March 9, 2022

This is an update of my post published on March 9, 2011:





Were the Americas named after a thief?

Well, that's what Ralph Waldo Emerson once wrote. See if you agree...



Born on this day in 1454, Amerigo Vespucci was an Italian navigator and mapmaker who made friends with Christopher Columbus near the end of the latter's life. Vespucci traveled westward on voyages of exploration with Spanish and Portuguese expeditions between 1499 and 1502. (Remember, Columbus was also an Italian navigator who sailed for Spain.)

A Portuguese man named Pedro Alvares Cabral was said to have discovered what we now call Brazil, and the king of Portugal wanted to know if it was an island or if it was connected to the lands that had been earlier discovered by Columbus and Spanish explorers. The king asked Vespucci to go along on the mission as an observer.
Vespucci apparently didn't command any of the voyages he was on (scholars disagree on the number), but he did help explore what we now call South America and confirmed that it was continental in size. Vespucci wrote some letters—scholars disagree on the number of letters, since some may be forgeries—and it was these writings that brought the west-lying lands to the attention of many Europeans as a New World, not as the “Indies” or part of Asia.


Above, colors added to make the map more clear.

Note that nobody knew much about what "America"
looked like, at that point, but mapmakers did have a
portion of the east coast of South and Central
America roughly correct.





In 1507 Martin Waldseemüller, a German map maker, produced the world map seen above in full, and in a close-up below.  It was on this map that the "New World" was first named America; Waldseemüller chose the name to honor Amerigo Vespucci because, he wrote, Amerigo was “its discoverer, a man of great ability.”


But since the New World was definitely not discovered by Amerigo Vespucci - it wasn't even discovered by Cabral or Columbus or Leif Ericson - it was ACTUALLY discovered by the people who first migrated to the lands, the people whose descendants became the “Native Americans” or "First Nations"...


Well, the name America is controversial now and was controversial then, too. Some people got very angry that Amerigo Vespucci was trying to upset the glory of Columbus—even though it was Waldseemüller who had done the naming. (Columbus himself never thought ill of Vespucci, apparently; he wrote to his son that Vespucci was a man of good will who had always tried to please him. But Waldseemüller's map with the name America was published the year after Columbus died.)

Some people claimed that Vespucci was a better self-promoter than navigator, cartographer (map maker), or explorer—and that his letters exaggerated the number of voyages he made, exaggerated his role on the voyages, and even flat-out lied about what he had seen. (But, as I said, scholars have found evidence that some of these letters were forgeries, not written by Vespucci.)

In the mid-1500s Bartholomew de Las Casas was quoted as saying, ”The new continent should have been called Columba and not, as it is unjustly called, America.” Centuries later, in the 1800s, Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, “Strange that broad America must wear the name of a thief. Amerigo Vespucci, the pickle dealer at Seville, who...managed in this lying world to supplant Columbus and baptize half the earth with his own dishonest name.”


By the way, there seems to be zero evidence that Vespucci was ever a pickle dealer. I gather that Emerson was trying to be funny while also casting Vespucci as not even a little bit heroic.

Many sources from Vespucci's lifetime and from modern scholars restores Vespucci's reputation and good name, at least for some people—there are those who dispute each claim. No matter what, it seems clear that the naming of the continents after Vespucci was largely a historical accident. A German map maker wished to honor an Italian man who worked for Portugal and Spain—and somehow the name caught on.


By calling what we now consider the Americas
a "New World," Vespucci set folks up for realizing
that these lands had nothing to do with "the Indies"
or other known lands of "the Far East."

It is interesting to me that some folks are taught that there are seven continents, and others are taught that there are six; the folks I know who live in a 6-continent world are those who count North and South America as one continent, which is called simply "America." (Some folks in the world consider North and South America to be two separate continents, but they count Europe and Asia as one continent - Eurasia - and some folks count only 5 or even only 4 continents in the world!) 

The thing is, everyone living in the "New World" can call themselves "Americans" or "americanos." Canadians, United States-ians, Mexicans, Panamanians, Cubans, Colombians, Peruvians, Argentinians - all the folks who live in North or South America, or the islands considered to be a part of the Americas, are in some sense Americans.

These kids are Uruguayans and americanos.

These folks are Brazilians and americanos.

This girl is quechua, Peruvian, and americana.

These folks are Paraguayan and americanos.


However, there is a difference in how American/americano is treated in various languages. In English, "America" is short for the United States of America, and "American" is the demonym for those living in the USA. In Spanish, the U.S. is "los estados unidos," the demonym varies from "estadounidense" to "americano," and "America" refers to the one continent that English speakers consider two and sometimes call "the Americas." 





(Wednesday of the first full week of March)



Plan ahead:


Check out my Pinterest boards for:

And here are my Pinterest boards for: 






October 12 - Columbus Day, Discovery Day, Día de la Raza, Day of the Americas, AND Indigenous People's Day

  Posted on October 12, 2021


This is an update of my post published on October 12, 2010:






This day has many other names besides the five given above and is either celebrated or commemorated with sorrow by many different groups and countries, especially in the so-called New World.

On this day in 1492, Christopher Columbus's expedition spotted land after voyaging across the Pacific Ocean from Spain for five weeks. The land they spotted was an island in the Bahamas. Columbus dubbed the island San Salvador and reported that the natives called it Guanahani. Actually, these days nobody knows for sure which island was the site of Columbus's first landing! People from at least three different islands in the Bahamas claim it was their island.


In the following journal entry from October 12, Columbus demonstrated the way of thought prevalent of Europeans of his time:

They [the native people he met on the island] ought to make good and skilled servants, for they repeat very quickly whatever we say to them. I think they can very easily be made Christians, for they seem to have no religion. If it pleases our Lord, I will take six of them to Your Highnesses when I depart, in order that they may learn our language."

It goes without saying that the way of thought prevalent of Europeans of Columbus's time was horrible. Specifically: it was super-duper racist. It was wrong factually, and it was wrong ethically.


Some folks display signs like the one above - "Columbus
didn't discover anything - 1000s of Native nation were
already here." Other say, "Columbus didn't discover the
Americas; he invaded them."


Here are a few other things that Columbus got wrong:

Columbus understood what all educated Westerners understood—that the world was round. However, Columbus differed from the accepted view of scholars in the size of the world. And Columbus, it turns out, was very, very wrong.


  • He thought the world was smaller than it was.
  • He thought that Europe was larger than it was.
  • And he thought that Japan and other inhabited islands were far east off the coast of China rather than being quite close.


Note that "Cigangu" is Japan, "Gallia" is Ireland, and "Hispania" is
Spain. The Canary Islands are spelled "Canarie" on this globe.

Columbus thought the distance from the Canary Islands (near Africa) to Japan was about 2,300 miles—but it was really almost six times farther, more than 12,000 miles away!!!

If it hadn't been for the fact that the Americas and their attendant islands had been close to the location Columbus expected to find the East Indies, Columbus's first expedition would have ended in death for all.

A few things that Columbus got right

Columbus was considered a brilliant mariner (one who steers a ship), and he knew how to use the trade winds to cross the Atlantic going westward and back again eastward. Without this knowledge, his first expedition would not have succeeded.

If that first expedition had failed, I wonder how long it would have been before there was sustained contact between the Americas and the rest of the world. Do you think that the "discovery" might have gone the other way? - that Native Americans might have explored and then "discovered" Europe, or Eastern Asia, or possibly even Africa?

If there was no "successful" Columbus, world history might have been dramatically different - but whether or not that history would have been happier is a huge question. 


Check out this video about Columbus.



Check out this book about the Taino (indigenous Caribbean people). Decenter Columbus - and instead celebrate the native peoples who had already "discovered" the Americas.