Posted
on May 25, 2014
The
entire field of biology is organized around the ideas that plants,
animals, and other organisms on Earth share common ancestors, that
today's organisms gradually evolved from earlier, simpler forms, and
that creatures seem ideally fit for the environments in which they
live because of natural selection.
Credit: Barebente |
Back
in 1925, even though scientists only knew a fraction of the
bajillions of bits of evidence scientists have amassed today to back
up the theory of evolution through natural selection, this theory had
already been accepted by biologists and was being taught in colleges
and high schools.
However,
some of the people in Tennessee were not happy with the findings of
biologists. They didn't want to believe that humans and chimpanzees
and slugs and redwoods all shared ancestry. Nature doesn't care
whether we like the way things are or not—reality is what it is, no
matter how we feel about it—but some of those unhappy people
decided that, if they couldn't control what scientific experiments
were showing or what scientific papers were saying, they could at
least control what science teachers in Tennessee were teaching.
And
so lawmakers in Tennessee passed the Butler Act, which made it
against the law to teach human evolution in any state-funded school.
The
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) knew that that law was based on
religious motivations and was therefore unconstitutional. The
organization offered to defend anyone actually accused of breaking
the law.
Several
people in the small town on Dayton, Tennessee, decided that the
controversy of an arrest and trial about the Butler Act would give
their town some much-needed publicity. The school superintendent
pointed out that one law mandates that high school science teachers
must instruct their students on the science in the adopted textbook,
and that the adopted textbook teaches about evolution, and the Butler
Act mandates that high school science teachers must NOT teach about
evolution. So one law says that teachers must break another law.
The
group asked a young teacher named John T. Scopes to plead guilty to
teaching the theory of evolution. He had gone through a chart in the evolution chapter from the textbook with the
class.
Scopes agreed to stand trial. He urged several students to testify against him and helped them to understand the kinds of things they needed to say to get an indictment.
Scopes agreed to stand trial. He urged several students to testify against him and helped them to understand the kinds of things they needed to say to get an indictment.
And
on this date in 1925, Scopes was indicted for teaching from the
chapter on evolution – from the textbook that had been adopted by
the state!
Scopes
was never put in jail, and he didn't even have to put up the money
for bail (a newspaper owner did that). Really, the entire trial was
sort of a set-up, motivated by a desire to bring publicity to the
town and to shine a light on a bad law.
The
townspeople who had made sure there would be a trial worked to get
the kind of lawyers who would ensure that the trial got publicity.
The school superintendent even wrote to British novelist H. G. Wells,
asking him to join the defense team! (Naturally, being a novelist
untrained in British law, let alone U.S. law, Wells said no thanks.)
The prosecution's law team did attract a famous lawyer, William
Jennings Bryan. Bryan had run for president several times and was a
former U.S. Secretary of State as well as a devout Christian.
Whether
because of the subject matter of the trial or because of the efforts
of the people of Dayton, the trial did get a lot of publicity.
Journalists from around the nation and even the world covered the
trial, and it was the first U.S. trial to be broadcast on national radio. The newspaper owner who had paid Scopes's bail used colorful phrases to stir up even more controversy and therefore
attract more attention. For example, he called the trial “Monkey
Trial” because Bryan criticized evolution for teaching
children that humans were descended from monkeys, and “[n]ot even from American monkeys, but from old world monkeys.”
It's
interesting that the defense attorneys, especially Clarence Darrow,
took a detour from the original strategy of pointing out that the
Butler Act violated the teacher's individual rights and academic
freedom, and that it was designed to benefit a particular religious
group and was therefore unconstitutional. In a way, Darrow put a
literal understanding of the Bible on trial. He encouraged people to
realize that the Bible's story of creation doesn't necessarily
conflict with evolution...that evolution could be the way that God
created the various species.
What
were the results of this famous trial?
- Since Scopes admitting to breaking the law, this made it easy for the jury to find him guilty!
- Scopes was ordered to pay a $100 fine (which would be more than $1,000 when adjusted for inflation), because the Butler Act specifically said that that was the minimum fine for breaking the law.
- In the 1927 appeal in Tennessee's Supreme Court, the court shocked many observers by finding the Butler Act to be constitutional but set aside the guilty verdict because of a legal technicality: under the state constitution, a Tennessee judge could not set a fine above $50, so the jury should have set the $100 fine!
- Decades later, in 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court found in a separate but related case that an Arkansas law similar to the Butler Act was unconstitutional because its primary purpose is religious. But the Butler Act had finally been repealed in 1967, the year before the Supreme Court's decision.
You
can learn more about the Scopes trial by watching an old film,
Inherit the Wind (1960).
Also
on this date:
Plan ahead:
Check out my Pinterest boards for:
And
here are my Pinterest boards for:
No comments:
Post a Comment